Open Access
Volume 39, Number 6, December 2021
Page(s) 1222 - 1232
Published online 21 March 2022
  1. Das P K, Behera H S, Panigrahi B K. A hybridization of an improved particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm for multi-robot path planning[J]. Swarm & Evolutionary Computation. 2016, 28: 14–28 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nouyan S, Campo A, Dorigo M. Path formation in a robot swarm[J]. Swarm Intelligence, 2008, 2(1): 1–23 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sperati V, Trianni V, Nolfi S. Evolution of self-organised path formation in a swarm of robots[C]//International Conference on Swarm Intelligence, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  4. Mcinnes C R. Autonomous path planning for on-orbit servicing vehicles[J]. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 2000, 53(1/2): 26–38 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lavalle S M, Kuffner Jr J J. Randomized kinodynamic planning[J]. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2001, 20(5): 378–400 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frazzoli Emilio. Quasi-random algorithms for real-time spacecraft motion planning and coordination[J]. Acta Astronautic, 2003, 53(4/5/6/7/8/9/10): 485–494 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feron E, Dahleh M, Frazzoli E, et al. A randomized attitude slew planning algorithm for autonomous spacecraft[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, California, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng P, Frazzoli E, Lavalle S M. Improving the performance of sampling-based planners by using a symmetry-exploiting gap reduction algorithm[C]//IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang P K C, Hadaegh F Y. Minimum-fuel formation reconfiguration of multiple free-flying spacecraft[J]. Journal of Astronautics Science, 1999, 47(1): 77–102 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cao Jing, Shen Hongxin, Li Hengnian. Global optimization strategy for reconfiguration of multi-satellite formations——solution to the second question of the 7th national space orbit design competition[J]. Mechanics in Engineering, 2016, 38(6): 697–704 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang Haibin. Research on the method of autonomous formation reconstruction of satellite formation flying[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Nasrollahy A Z, Javadi H H S. Using particle swarm optimization for robot path planning in dynamic environments with moving obstacles and target[C]//European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation, Athens, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang Bin. Research on hunting behavior of group robots based on particle swarm optimization[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University of Technology, 2013 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Xie Jing. Research on multi-robot group game and coordinated control in confrontation environment[D]. Nanchang: East China Jiaotong University, 2013 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Howard D Curtis. Orbital mechanics[M]. ZHOU Jianhua, Trans. Beijing: Science Press, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang Zhaokui. Research on distributed satellite dynamics modeling and control[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2006 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang Rong, Xiong Zhi, Liu Jianye. Research on relative guidance algorithm based on successive multi-pulse[J]. Automation and Instrumentation, 2018(1): 4–8 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Fang Qun, Li Xinguo, Zhu Zhanxia, et al. Aerospace flight dynamics[M]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, 2015 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang Z, Hirata Y, Kosuge K. Dynamic object closure by multiple mobile robots and random caging formation testing[C]//IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  20. Wan W, Sun C, Yuan J. The caging configuration design and optimization for planar moving objects using multi-fingered mechanism[J]. Advanced Robotics, 2019, 33(18): 925–943 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.