Open Access
Volume 40, Number 1, February 2022
Page(s) 33 - 39
Published online 02 May 2022
  1. Benkhedda A, Tounsi A, Adda Bedia E A. Effect of temperature and humidity on transient hygrothermal stresses during moisture desorption in laminated composite plates[J]. Composite Structures, 2008, 82(4): 629–635 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Li Guoli, Peng Gongqiu, Zhong Xiangyu. Characterization of domestic high performance carbon fibers and mechanical properties of carbon fibers reinforced matrix composites[J]. Journal of Materials Enineering. 2020, 48(10): 74–81 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Guan Qingyu, Li Weiping. Effect of hygro-thermal condition on typical mechanical property of 7781/CYCOM 7701 fiberglass/epoxy composite[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2018, 35(12): 3288–3297 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Yang Q, Li X, Shi L, et al. The thermal characteristics of epoxy resin: design and predict by using molecular simulation method[J]. Polymer, 2013, 54(23): 6447–6454 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eftekhari M, Fatemi A. Tensile behavior of thermoplastic composites including temperature, moisture, and hygrothermal effects[J]. Polymer Testing, 2016, 51: 151–164 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Almeida J H S, Souza S D B, Botelho E C, et al. Carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy filament-wound composite laminates exposed to hygrothermal conditioning[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2016, 51(9): 4697–4708 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johar M, Kang H S, Chong W W F, et al. A further generalized thickness-dependent non-Fickian moisture absorption model using plain woven epoxy composites[J]. Polymer Testing, 2018, 69: 522–527 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hagihara H, Watanabe R, Shimada T, et al. Degradation mechanism of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastics exposed to hot steam studied by chemical and structural analyses of nylon 6 matrix[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2018, 112: 126–133 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Scida D, Aboura Z, Benzeggagh M L. The effect of ageing on the damage events in woven-fibre composite materials under different loading conditions[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2002, 62(4): 551–557 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li Min, Zhang Baoyan. Study on hygrothermal-resistant properties of 5248/T700 composite system[J]. Fiber composites, 2006 (1): 3–4 [Article](in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Won J P, Lee S J, Kim Y J, et al. The effect of exposure to alkaline solution and water on the strength-porosity relationship of GFRP rebar[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2008, 39(5): 764–772 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Niu Yifan, Li Zhangqi, Zhu Xiaofeng. Flexural properties and life-time estimation of carbon fiber/epoxy composite under hygrothermal conditions[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2020, 37(1): 104–112 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Sang L, Wang Y, Wang C, et al. Moisture diffusion and damage characteristics of carbon fabric reinforced polyamide 6 laminates under hydrothermal aging[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2019, 123: 242–252[Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bao L, Yee A F, Lee C Y C. Moisture absorption and hygrothermal aging in a bismaleimide resin[J]. Polymer, 2001, 42(17): 7327–7333[Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wong K J, Low K O, Israr H A, et al. Thickness-dependent non-Fickian moisture absorption in epoxy molding compounds[J]. Microelectronics Reliability, 2016, 65: 160–166[Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhokh A, Strizhak P. Crossover between Fickian and non-Fickian diffusion in a system with hierarchy[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2019, 282: 22–28[Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guermazi N, Ben Tarjem A, Ksouri I, et al. On the durability of FRP composites for aircraft structures in hygrothermal conditioning[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 85: 294–304 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang Xudong, An Tao, Zou Tianchun, et al. Effect of hygrothermal environment on mechanical properties and damage mechanism of CFRP[J]. Journal of Materials Enineering, 2019, 47(7): 84–91[Article](in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Kumar S B, Sridhar I, Sivashanker S. Influence of humid environment on the performance of high strength structural carbon fiber composites[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2008, 498(1): 174–178 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tan Xiangfei, Tan Pengda, He Yuting, et al. Moisture behavior of aeronautic carbon fiber reinforced resin composite stiffened panel[J]. Journal of Materials Enineering, 2018, 46(12): 61–69 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Khay M, Ngo A D, Ganesan R. Experimental investigation and phenomenological modeling of hygrothermal effect on tensile fatigue behavior of carbon/epoxy plain weave laminates[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2018, 52(27): 3803–3818 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sales R C M, De Sousa A F, Brito C B G, et al. Analysis of hygrothermal effects on mixed mode I/Ⅱ interlaminar fracture toughness of carbon composites joints[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2020, 97: 102477 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Standard test method for moisture absorption properties and equilibrium conditioning of polymer matrix composite materials[S]. ASTM D5229/D5229M-14 [Google Scholar]
  24. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials[S]. ASTM D3039/D3039M-00 [Google Scholar]
  25. Toscano A, Pitarresi G, Scafidi M, et al. Water diffusion and swelling stresses in highly crosslinked epoxy matrices[J]. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2016, 133: 255–263 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.