Open Access
| Issue |
JNWPU
Volume 40, Number 4, August 2022
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 796 - 803 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20224040796 | |
| Published online | 30 September 2022 | |
- LI Zhuo, XU Zhe, CHEN Xin, et al. Location-related online multi-task assignment algorithm for mobile crowd sensing[J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(6): 102–106 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- JIANG Weijin, LYU Sijian, LIU Yuehua, et al. Task distribution method of participatory sensing based on urban rail transit[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(10): 3035–3042 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- WANG Xin, LIAO Yiwei, ZHAO Guosheng, et al. A task assignment model of mobile crowd sensing oriented requirements[J]. Computer Engineering & Science, 2021, 43(8): 1512–1520 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- ZHONG Chongquan, LIU Zhengyi, ZHAO Liang, et al. Task scheduling algorithm in PAC system based on heuristic shortest path[J]. Instrument Technique and Sensor, 2016(12): 129–135 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- WANG Congwen, WANG Can, XU Chunming, et al. Task assignment algorithm based on worker credibility and distance[J]. Value Engineering, 2020, 39(16): 201–203 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- XIONG Yuanwu, ZHAO Lingzhong, ZHAI Zhongyi. Multi-agent task assignment based on differential evolution algorithm[J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2019, 40(10): 3020–3029 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- WANG Zhuohao, YANG Dongju, XU Chenyang. Research on distributed ETL tasks scheduling strategy based on ISE algorithm[J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(12): 1–7 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- MENG Di, ZHANG Qun, LUO Ying, et al. An effective scheduling algorithm for digital array radar based on pulse interleaving[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(8): 172–181 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- KOMORNICZAK W, PIETRASINSKI J. Selected problems of MFR resources management[C]//The 3rd International Conference on Information Fusion, Paris, France, 2000: 10-13 [Google Scholar]
- VINE M T. Fuzzy logic in radar resource management[C]//IEEE Multifunction Radar and Sonar Sensor Management Techniques, 2001 [Google Scholar]
- CAI Yucen, DU Pengzhen. Path planning of unmanned ground vehicle based on balanced whale optimization algorithm[J]. Control and Decision, 2021, 36(11): 2647–2655 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- KAUR G, ARORA S. Chaotic whale optimization algorithm[J]. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2018, 5(3): 275–284 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- CHU Dingli, CHEN Hong, WANG Xuguang. Whale optimization algorithm based on adaptive weight and simulated annealing[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2019, 47(5): 992–999 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- SUN Mingcai, ZHANG Qin, YUAN Junchao, et al. Tracking task scheduling method of phased array radars based on modified time window[J]. Measurement & Control Technology, 2017, 36(10): 74–78 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- DUAN Yi, TAN Xiansi, QU Zhiguo, et al. Task scheduling algorithm for phased array radar based on shifting impact rate[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(11): 2470–2476 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- DUAN Yi, TAN Xiansi, QU Zhiguo, et al. Task scheduling algorithm for phased array radar based on value density[J]. Radar Science and Technology, 2018, 16(3): 291–297 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- REN Chunhui, LIU Sheng, ZHANG Weikang, et al. Optimization and application of cauchy mutation camel algorithm[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2021, 57(21): 87–94 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- QI Jie, WANG Dingwei. Overview of extremal optimization algorithm[J]. Control and Decision, 2007, 22(10): 1081–1085 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.