Open Access
Volume 41, Number 4, August 2023
Page(s) 802 - 811
Published online 08 December 2023
  1. KNOGL J S, HENKEL P, GUNTHER C. Precise positioning of a geostationary data relay using LEO satellites[C]//53rd International Symposium Elmar, 2011: 325–328 [Google Scholar]
  2. VIGHNESAM NV, SONNEY A, SONI P K. CARTOSAT-1 orbit determination system and achieved accuracy during early phase[C]//2007 AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2007: 511–522 [Google Scholar]
  3. ZHOU P, DU L, LI X, et al. Near real-time BDS GEO satellite orbit determination and maneuver analysis with reversed point positioning[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2018, 63(5): 1781–1791 [Google Scholar]
  4. DING Li, XUE Cheng, JIA Xiaolin, et al. Precision analysis of BDS-3 satellite orbit by using slr data[C]//China Satellite Navigation Conference 2019 Proceedings, 2019: 389–399 [Google Scholar]
  5. LARKI M H A, MABOODI M, BOLANDI H. Satellite orbit determination based on gradient method[C]//Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2012: 2554–2559 [Google Scholar]
  6. BAI Xianzong. Research on orbital prediction error and collision probability of space objects[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2013 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. HE Ruofei, TIAN Xuetao, LIU Hongjuan, et al. A UAV target localization approach based on Monte-Carlo Kalman filter[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2017, 35(3): 435–441. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. YAN Haifeng, WEI Wenhui, FENG Zhihua, et al. Research on high-performance algorithm for pseudolite air based positioning[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015, 33(5): 763–769. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. CHEN Zhaoyue, LIU Li, CHEN Shulin, et al. Interval uncertainty analysis of soft-landing dynamics of lunar lander[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(2): 442–448 [Google Scholar]
  10. GU Defeng, YI Dongyun, ZHU Jubo, et al. Closed-form solution of distributed InSAR geolocation and its precision analysis[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2007(6): 1026–1031. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. ZHENG Jinjun, CAO Zhigang. Positioning precision of three satellite constellation using relative locations in the presence of correlated satellite positioning errors[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University, 2004(10): 1398–1401. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  12. YI Shan. Effectiveness evaluation of remote sensing satellite system based on uncertainty[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. GAO Chen, YANG Zhen, NIU Wenlong. Linear surrogate uncertainty analysis method for distributed satellite system[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2021, 41(6): 928–935. [Article] (in Chinese) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. ZHANG Houle, WU Yongxin, WANG Juncheng. Analysis of stochastic errors and gaussianity of random vector process simulated by dimension-reduction representation method[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2022, 109: 283–303 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. YANG Chen. Research on performance uncertainty analysis methods for distributed satellite system in conceptual design phase[D]. Beijing: China University of Science, 2020 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. MAGGIONI V, SAPIANO M R P, ADLER R F. Estimating uncertainties in high-resolution satellite precipitation products: systematic or random error[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2016, 17(4): 1119–1129 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. WANG Suihui. Error theory and basis of surveying adjustment[M]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2015 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. TANG Ning, WANF Shaoping, HONG Difeng. A calculation method of minimum distance between wellbore survey error ellipsoid[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(11): 1320–1325. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.