EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 43 / No 5 (October 2025) JNWPU, 43 5 (2025) 1003-1013 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 43, Number 5, October 2025
Page(s) 1003 - 1013
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20254351003
Published online 05 December 2025
  1. MARK C P, KAMATH S. Review of active space debris removal methods[J]. Space Policy, 2019, 47: 194–206. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. LI W J, CHENG D Y, LIU X G, et al. On-orbit service(OOS) of spacecraft: a review of engineering developments[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 108: 32–120. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  3. NISHIDA S I, KAWAMOTO S, OKAWA Y, et al. Space debris removal system using a small satellite[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2009, 65(1/2): 95–102 [Google Scholar]
  4. XU Y. Adaptive attitude-tracking control of spacecraft considering on-orbit refueling[J]. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 2021, 43(6): 1298–1309. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  5. NAVABI M, AKHLOUMADI M R. Nonlinear optimal control of relative rotational and translational motion of spacecraft rendezvous[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2017, 30(5): 04017038. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. ISHKOV S A, FILIPPOV G A, ZHOU Xiao, et al. Pareto-optimal control of relative motion in the orbital maneuvering problem of spacecraft with finite thrust[J]. Journal of Northwestemm Polytechnical University, 2023, 41(3): 529–536. [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. HAN F, WANG Z, HE L, et al. Trajectory plan for an ultra-short distance on-orbit service based on the Gaussian pseudo-spectral method[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2018(99): 1–9 [Google Scholar]
  8. VENTURA J, CIARCIA M, ROMANO M, et al. Fast and near-optimal guidance for docking to uncontrolled spacecraft[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2016, 40(12): 3138–3154 [Google Scholar]
  9. WU Hailei, HAN Fei, HE Liang, et al. Trajectory planning based on inverse dynamics in virtual domain for approaching tumbling target[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2018, 35(10): 1464–1472 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. ZHOU D, ZHANG Y, LI S. Receding horizon guidance and control using sequential convex programming for spacecraft 6-DOF close proximity[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 87: 459–477. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  11. ZHENG Jiangming. Research on integrated prediction, planning, and control of intelligent vehicles based on MPC[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2024 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. LORENZEN M, CANNON M, ALLGÖWER F. Robust MPC with recursive model update[J]. Automatica, 2019, 103: 461–471. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  13. WEISS A, BALDWIN M, ERWIN R S, et al. Model predictive control for spacecraft rendezvous and docking: strategies for handling constraints and case studies[J]. IEEE Trans on Control Systems Technology, 2015, 23(4): 1638–1647. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. LI P, ZHU Z H. Model predictive control for spacecraft rendezvous in elliptical orbit[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2018, 146: 339–348. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  15. ZHAO L, LU Z, LIAO W, et al. Fault-tolerant control for satellite autonomous rendezvous with quality characteristics and actuator uncertainties[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2024, 150: 109182. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  16. LI Q, YUAN J, ZHANG B, et al. Model predictive control for autonomous rendezvous and docking with a tumbling target[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 69: 700–711. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  17. LOPEZ B T, SLOTINE J J E, HOW J P. Dynamic tube MPC for nonlinear systems[C]//2019 American Control Conference, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  18. BUCKNER C, LAMPARIELLO R. Tube-based model predictive control for the approach maneuver of a spacecraft to a free-tumbling target satellite[C]//2018 American Control Conference, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  19. DONG K, LUO J, DANG Z, et al. Tube-based robust output feedback model predictive control for autonomous rendezvous and docking with a tumbling target[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2020, 65(4): 1158–1181. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  20. ALBEE K, OESTREICH C, SPECHT C, et al. A robust observation, planning, and control pipeline for autonomous rendezvous with tumbling targets[J]. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2021, 8: 641338. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  21. OESTREICH C E, LINARES R, GONDHALEKAR R. Tube-Based model predictive control with uncertainty identification for autonomous spacecraft maneuvers[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2023, 46(1): 6–20. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  22. SPECHT C, BISHNOI A, LAMPARIELLO R. Autonomous spacecraft rendezvous using tube-based model predictive control: design and application[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2023, 46(7): 1243–1261. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  23. CAUBET A, BIGGS J D. An inverse dynamics approach to the guidance of spacecraft in close proximity of tumbling debris[J]. Detail, 2015, 7: 9 [Google Scholar]
  24. FERRAMOSCA A, LIMÓN D, ALVARADO I, et al. MPC for tracking with optimal closed-loop performance[C]//47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  25. LIMÓN D, ALVARADO I, ALAMO T, et al. Robust tube-based MPC for tracking of constrained linear systems with additive disturbances[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2010, 20(3): 248–260. [Article] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.