EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 43 / No 5 (October 2025) JNWPU, 43 5 (2025) 869-877 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 43, Number 5, October 2025
Page(s) 869 - 877
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20254350869
Published online 05 December 2025
  1. HASOFER A M, LIND N C. An exact and invariant first order reliability format[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, 1974, 100(1): 111–121 [Google Scholar]
  2. KIUREGHIAN A D, DESTEFANO M. Efficient algorithm for 2nd-order reliability analysis[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, 1991, 117(12): 2904–2923 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  3. AU S K, BECK J L. Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2001, 16(4): 263–277 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  4. AU S K, BECK J L. Important sampling in high dimensions[J]. Structural Safety, 2003, 25(2): 139–163 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  5. PRADLWARTER H J, SCHUELLER G I, KOUTSOURELAKIS P Set al. Application of line sampling simulation method to reliability benchmark problems[J]. Structural Safety, 2007, 29(3): 208–221 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. DITLEVSEN O, OLESEN R, MOHR G. Solution of a class of load combination problems by directional simulation[J]. Structural Safety, 1986, 4(2): 95–109 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  7. AU S K, BECK J L. A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations[J]. Structural Safety, 1999, 21(2): 135–158 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  8. PAPAIOANNOU I, PAPADIMITRIOU C, STRAUB D. Sequential importance sampling for structural reliability analysis[J]. Structural Safety, 2016, 62: 66–75 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  9. DUBOURG V, SUDRET B, DEHEEGER F. Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 33: 47–57 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  10. SONG Shufang, LYU Zhenzhou. Reliability sensitivity analysis based on subset simulation and importance sampling[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanic, 2008, 40(5): 654–662 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. ECHARD B, GAYTON N, LEMAIRE M. AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Structural Safety, 2011, 33(2): 145–154 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. FAURIAT W, GAYTON N. AK-SYS: an adaptation of the AK-MCS method for system reliability[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2014, 123: 137–144 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  13. DUBOURG V, SUDRET B, DEHEEGER F. Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 33: 47–57 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. WEI Xinpeng, YAO Zhongyang, BAO Wenli, et al. Evidence-theory-based reliability analysis method using active-learning Kriging model[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(2): 356–368 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. ZHU X, LU Z, YUN W. An efficient method for estimating failure probability of the structure with multiple implicit failure domains by combining Meta-IS with IS-AK[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2020, 193: 106644 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  16. ZHOU Ce, BAI Bin, YE Nan. Reliability prediction of engineering system based on adaptive particle swarm optimization support vector regression[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(14): 328–338 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. HU Weifei, LIAO Jiale, GUO Yunfeiet al. Time-dependent reliability analysis based on physics-informed neutral network[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(13): 141–153 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. GASSER M, SCHUELLER G I. Reliability-based optimization of structural systems[J]. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 1997, 46: 287–307 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  19. JENSEN H A. Structural optimization of linear dynamical systems under stochastic excitation: a moving reliability database approach[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 194(12/13/14/15/16): 1757–1778 [Google Scholar]
  20. LING Chunyan, LYU Zhenzhou, YUAN Wanying. Efficient method for failure probability function[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2018, 40(3): 159–167 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. AU S K. Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation[J]. Computers and Structures, 2005, 83(14): 1048–1061 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  22. CHING J, HSIEH Y H. Local estimation of failure probability function and its confidence interval with maximum entropy principle[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 22(1): 39–49 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  23. YUAN X, LIU S, VALDEBENITO M A, et al. Efficient procedure for failure probability function estimation in augmented space[J]. Structural Safety, 2021, 92: 102104 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. NIKOLAIDIS E, SALEEM S. Probabilistic reanalysis using Monte Carlo simulation[J]. SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, 2009, 1(1): 22–35 [Google Scholar]
  25. LI L, LU Z. A new algorithm for importance analysis of the inputs with distribution parameter uncertainty[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2016, 47(13): 3065–3077 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. CHEN Zhiyuan, LI Luyi. Efficient methods for reliability sensitivity analysis of the inputs with distribution parameter uncertainty[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(9): 1–20 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. YUAN X. Local estimation of failure probability function by weighted approach[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 34: 1–11 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  28. WEI P, LU Z, SONG J. Extended Monte Carlo simulation for parametric global sensitivity analysis and optimization[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(4): 867–878 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  29. ZHOU C, LI C, ZHANG H, et al. Reliability and sensitivity analysis of composite structures by an adaptive Kriging based approach[J]. Composite Structures, 2021, 278: 114682 [Article] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.