Open Access
表1
本文的译码器与现有的LDPC(8 176, 7 154)译码器资源对比
文献 | 译码算法 | 迭代次数 | 芯片 | 时钟频率/MHz | 吞吐量/(b·s-1) | 存储器 | 面积 |
注:表格中括号里的百分比表示译码器所耗费资源占FPGA总资源的比例。 | |||||||
2007[3] | F-SPA | 15 | XC2V6000 | 193.4 | 193 | 128个18k(88%) | LUT:28 229(41%) FF:26 926 (39%) |
2009[7] | BP-based | 18 | EP2S180 | 200 | 640 | 1 300 kb(20%) | ALUs:38 000(27%) FF:30 000(27%) |
2011[5] | NMS | 15 | XC4VLX160 | 212 | 714 | 1 440 kb80个 18 k(28%) |
LUT:27 046(20%) FF:27 210(20%) |
本文 | NMSA | 14 | XC4VLX160 | 250 | 2 000 | 560 kb164个 18k(57%) |
LUT:56 778(42%) FF:86 942(64%) |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.