EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 37 / No 2 (April 2019) JNWPU, 37 2 (2019) 249-257 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 37, Number 2, April 2019
Page(s) 249 - 257
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20193720249
Published online 05 August 2019
  1. Song F, Lu B. An Automatic Video Image Mosaic Algorithm Based on Sift Feature Matching[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Communication, Electronics and Automation Engineering, 2012: 879–886 [Google Scholar]
  2. Zeng Qinghua, Pan Pengju, Liu Jianye, et al. Fast and Accurate Target Positioning with Large Viewpoint Based on Inertial Navigation System Information Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(8): 193–205 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mur-Artal R, Tardós J D. ORB-Slam2:an Open-Source Slam System for Monocular, Stereo, and RGB-D Cameras[J]. IEEE Trans on Robotics, 2017, 33(5): 1255–1262 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lowe D G. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2): 91–110 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bay H, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L. Surf: Speeded up Robust Features[C]//European Conference on Computer Vision, 2006: 404–417 [Google Scholar]
  6. Rublee E, Rabaud V, Konolige K, et al. ORB: An Efficient Alternative to SIFT or SURF[C]//IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2011: 2564–2571 [Google Scholar]
  7. Harris C, Stephens M J. A Combined Corner and Edge Detector[C]//Proceedings of the Facrthe Alvey Vision Conference, Manchester, UK 1988: 147–152 [Google Scholar]
  8. Jin R, Kim J. Tracking Feature Extraction Techniques with Improved SIFT for Video Identification[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2017, 76(4): 5927–5936 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu T, Miao Z. An Improved Feature Image Matching Algorithm Based on Locality-Sensitive Hashing[C]//2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on Signal Processing, 2016: 723–728 [Google Scholar]
  10. Xia C, Wei P. An Improved SIFT Descriptor Based on In-Out Region Division[C]//2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Signal and Image Processing, 2017: 101–105 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lei Junfeng, Zhu Yueling, Xiao Jinsheng, et al. Improved of SIFT Matching Algorithm Based on Main Gradient of Direction Computer Engineeringand Applications, 2015, 51(13): 149–152 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yin L, Hou J, Li W. An Improved Feature Matching Method Base on Gradient Constraint[C]//2014 International Conference on Mechatronics and Control, 2014: 684–688 [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang Y. An Improved Image Feature Matching Method Based on SIFT Descriptor[J]. Boletín Técnico, 2017, 55(3): 300–306 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nakhmani A, Tannenbaum A. A New Distance Measure Based on Generalized Image Normalized Cross-Correlation for Robust Video Tracking and Image Recognition[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2013, 34(3): 315–321 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dinh V Q, Pham C C, Jeon J W. Robust Adaptive Normalized Cross-Correlation for Stereo Matching Cost Computation[J]. IEEE Trans on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2017, 27(7): 1421–1434 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rao Y R, Prathapani N, Nagabhooshanam E. Application of Normalized Cross Correlation to Image Registration[J]. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2014, 3(5): 12–16 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yi K M, Trulls E, Lepetit V, et al. Lift: Learned Invariant Feature Transform[C]//European Conference on Computer Vision, 2016: 467–483 [Google Scholar]
  18. Arya S, Mount D M. Approximate Nearest Neighbor Queries in Fixed Dimensions[C]//Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithm, 1993: 271–280 [Google Scholar]
  19. Muja M, Lowe D G. Fast Approximate Nearest Neighbors with Automatic Algorithm Configuration[C]//Proceedings of the 4th Internetiarnal Conterence on Computer Vision theory and Appications, 2009: 331–340 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fischler M A, Bolles R C. Random Sample Consensus:a Paradigm for Model Fitting with Applications to Image Analysis and Automated Cartography[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1981, 24(6): 381–395 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaur G, Agrawal P. Optimisation of Image Fusion Using Feature Matching Based on SIFT and RANSAC[J]. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2016, 9(47): 1–7 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li Huihui, Zheng Ping, Yang Ning, et al. Relative Angle Distance for Image Registration Based on SIFT Feature Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2017, 35(2): 280–285 (in Chinese) [Article] [Article] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chou C C, Wang C C. 2-Point RANSAC for Scene Image Matching under Large Viewpoint Changes[C]//2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2015: 3646–3651 [Google Scholar]
  24. Tan Renlong, Wan Youchuan. SIFT Mismatched Feature Point Elimination Method Based on Main Direction Geospatial Information, 2014, 12(1): 101–103 (in Chinese) [Article] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bian J W, Lin W Y, Matsushita Y, et al. Gms: Grid-Based Motion Statistics for Fast, Ultra-Robust Feature Correspondence[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017: 2828–2837 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sturm J, Engelhard N, Endres F, et al. A Benchmark for the Evaluation of RGB-D SLAM Systems[C]//2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2012: 573–580 [Google Scholar]
  27. Aans H, Dahl A L, Pedersen K S. Interesting Interest Points[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2012, 97(1): 18–35 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Laganère R. OpenCV Computer Vision Application Programming Cookbook Second Edition. Birmingham, UK, Packt Publishing Ltd, 2014 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.