EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 43 / No 3 (June 2025) JNWPU, 43 3 (2025) 467-477 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 43, Number 3, June 2025
Page(s) 467 - 477
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20254330467
Published online 11 August 2025
  1. LI X, GONG C L, GU L X, et al. A sequential surrogate method for reliability analysis based on radial basis function[J]. Structural Safety, 2018, 73: 42–53 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  2. DU X P, CHEN W. A most probable point-based method for efficient uncertainty analysis[J]. Journal of Design and Manufacturing Automation, 2001, 4(1): 47–66 [Google Scholar]
  3. PAFFATH M, WEVER U. Adapted polynomial chaos expansion for failure detection[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2007, 226(1): 263–281 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  4. YOUN B D, CHOI K K, DU L. Adaptive probability analysis using an enhanced hybrid mean value method[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2005, 29(2): 134–148 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  5. CHEN J B, LI J. The extreme value distribution and dynamic reliability analysis of nonlinear structures with uncertain parameters[J]. Structural Safety, 2007, 29(2): 77–93 [Google Scholar]
  6. LI J, CHEN J B, FAN W L. The equivalent extreme-value event and evaluation of the structural system reliability[J]. Structural Safety, 2007, 29(2): 112–131 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  7. WANG Z Q, WANG P F. A nested extreme response surface approach for RBDO with time-dependent probabilistic constraints[C]//38th Design Automation Conference, Chicago, 2012: 735–744 [Google Scholar]
  8. HU Z, DU X P. A sampling approach to extreme value distribution for time-dependent reliability analysis[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2013, 135(7): 1–8 [Google Scholar]
  9. WANG Z Q, CHEN W. Time-variant reliability assessment through equivalent stochastic process transformation[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2016, 152: 166–175 [Google Scholar]
  10. RICE S O. Mathematical analysis of random noise[J]. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 1944, 24(1): 46–156 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  11. ANDRIEU-RENAUD C, SUDRET B, LEMAIRE M. The PHI2 method: a way to compute time-variant reliability[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2004, 84(1): 75–86 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  12. SUDRET B. Analytical derivation of the outcrossing rate in time-variant reliability problems[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2008, 4(5): 353–362 [Google Scholar]
  13. HU Z, DU X P. Time-dependent reliability analysis with joint upcrossing rates[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimiza-tion, 2013, 48(5): 893–907 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. HU Z, MAHADEVAN S. Time-dependent system reliability analysis using random field discretization[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2015, 137(10): 101404[Article] [Google Scholar]
  15. HU Z, DU X P. First order reliability method for time-variant problems using series expansions[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51(1): 1–21 [Google Scholar]
  16. JIANG C, HUANG X P, HAN X, et al. A time-variant reliability analysis method based on stochastic process discretization[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2014, 136(9): 91009[Article] [Google Scholar]
  17. JIANG C, WEI X P, WU B, et al. An improved TRPD method for time-variant reliability analysis[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 58(5): 1935–1946 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  18. GONG C Q, FRANGOPOL D M. An efficient time-dependent reliability method[J]. Structural Safety, 2019, 81: 101864 [Google Scholar]
  19. ZHANG Y W, GONG C L, LI C N. Efficient time-variant reliability analysis through approximating the most probable point trajectory[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 63(1): 289–309 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  20. HU Z, MANSOUR R, OLSSON M, et al. Second-order reliability methods: a review and comparative study[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 64(6): 3233–3263 [Google Scholar]
  21. HU Z, DU X P. Second order reliability method for time-dependent reliability analysis using sequential efficient global optimization[C]//45th Design Automation Conference, Anaheim, California, USA, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  22. LIU P L, KIUREGHIAN A D. Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 1986, 1(2): 105–112 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  23. ZHANG Y, KIUREGHIAN A D. Reliability and optimization of structural systems[M]. Boston: Springer US, 1995: 297–304 [Google Scholar]
  24. LIM J M, LEE B C, LEE I. Second-order reliability method-based inverse reliability analysis using Hessian update for accurate and efficient reliability-based design optimization[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2014, 100(10): 773–792 [Google Scholar]
  25. ADHIKARI S. Reliability analysis using parabolic failure surface approximation[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130(12): 1407–1427 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  26. ZHAO Y G, ONO T. New approximations for SORM: part 1[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1999, 125: 86–93 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  27. XU F Y, MA X L. An efficient simulation algorithm for non-Gaussian nonstationary processes[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 63: 103105 [Google Scholar]
  28. GHANEM R G, SPANOS P D. Stochastic finite elements: a spectral approach[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992 [Google Scholar]
  29. HAWCHAR L, EI-SOUEIDY C P, SCHOEFS F. Global kriging surrogate modeling for general time-variant reliability-based design optimization problems[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 58(3): 955–968 [Google Scholar]
  30. LIU Yingwei, ZHENG Dongqing, HOU Junping, et al. Reliability analysis for the deploying mechanism of missile wing[J]. Hongdu Science and Technology, 2001(1): 53–57 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.