Open Access
| Issue |
JNWPU
Volume 43, Number 4, August 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 694 - 701 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20254340694 | |
| Published online | 07 October 2025 | |
- STARIKOV R, SCHÕN J. Quasi-static behaviour of composite joints with protruding-head bolts[J]. Composite Structures, 2001, 51(4): 411–425 [Google Scholar]
- CROXFORD A M, DAVIDSON P, WAAS A M. Influence of hole eccentricity on failure progression in a double shear bolted joint(DSBJ)[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2018, 168(10): 179–187 [Google Scholar]
- TANG Jianmao. Current status and trends of advanced composites in aerospace[J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2013, 30(4): 352–359 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- ALAN H. The evolution of the composite fuselage-a manufacturing perspective[J]. SAE International Journal of Aerospace, 2017, 10(2): 77–91 [Google Scholar]
- HUANG Zhichao, CHEN Weida, CHENG Wenyu, et al. Development of composite connection techniques[J]. Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 2013, 30(4): 1–6 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- WO Xiyuan. Adhesive bonded technology of composite[J]. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 1996, 17(1): 52–58 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- CHOWDHURY N M, WANG J, CHIU W K, et al. Static and fatigue testing bolted, bonded and hybrid step lap joints of thick carbon fibre/epoxy laminates used on aircraft structures[J]. Composite Structures, 2016, 142: 96–106 [Google Scholar]
- XU Wei, CHEN Li, ZHANG Qiancheng, et al. Mechanical behavior of the bond interface and its characterization[J]. Scientia Sinica(Technologica), 2012, 42(12): 1361–1376 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- MCCARTHY M. BOJCAS: bolted joints in composite aircraft structures[J]. Air & Space Europe, 2001, 3(3): 139–142 [Google Scholar]
- COELHO A M G, MOTTRAM J T. A review of the behaviour and analysis of bolted connections and joints in pultruded fibre reinforced polymers[J]. Materials & Design, 2015, 74(3): 86–107 [Google Scholar]
- CAO Zengqiang, ZHANG Minghao, TAN Xuecai, et al. Overview of riveting technology for aviation composite structure[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2023, 66(suppl.1): 26–37 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- JIANG H, ZENG C, LI G, et al. Effect of locking mode on mechanical properties and failure behavior of CFRP/Al electromagnetic riveted joint[J]. Composite Structures, 2020, 257: 113–162 [Google Scholar]
- YU Haiping, ZHANG Xu, ZHANG Maoyun, et al. Experimental investigation on feasibility of substituting large diameter riveting for bolting[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 4: 1–4 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- CHEN Qian. Study on dynamic plastic deformation of rivet and joint performance in electromagnetic riveting process[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2017 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- ZHAO Letian, YANG Tianzhi, HUANG Qi, et al. Damage behavior and mechanical property investigation of CFRP/CFRP washer-bushing riveted joints[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2023, 41(6): 1089–1096 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- FU Pingpo, ZENG Xiangrui, DING Hua, et al. Influencing factors and research progress of self-piercing riveting process for resin matrix composite[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2023, 40(4): 1819–1840 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- YANG Z, JIANG R, ZUO Y. Riveting damage behavior and mechanical performance assessments of CFRP/CFRP single-lap gasket-riveted joints[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2023, 149: 107253 [Google Scholar]
- YUAN Hongxuan. Connecting techniques of the modern long life aircraft[J]. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering, 2002, 3: 46–47 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- WANG Xingye, TANG Yuzhang. Mechanical properties of composite materials[M]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology Press, 1998 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.