EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 43 / No 5 (October 2025) JNWPU, 43 5 (2025) 1029-1040 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 43, Number 5, October 2025
Page(s) 1029 - 1040
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20254351029
Published online 05 December 2025
  1. SONG Zhengyu, HUANG Bing, WANG Xiaowei, et al. Development and key technologies of reusable launch vehicle[J]. Science and Technology Foresight, 2022, 1(1): 62 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. BONHOMME C, IANNETTI A, GIRARD N, et al. Prometheus: European next generation liquid rocket engine[C]//68th International Aeronautical Congress, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  3. RICHARDSON M P, HARDY D W F. Economic benefits of reusable launch vehicles for space debris removal[J]. New Space, 2018, 6(3): 227–237. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  4. PANG Zhihao. The significance and key technologies of reusable rockets[J]. Science and Technology Review, 2016, 34(1): 15–19 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. TIAN Feng. Starship SN-8 test flight: the first step of a long march[J]. Space Exploration, 2021(2): 46–53 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. SONG Z Y, HUANG B, WANG X W, et al. Status and challenges of reusable launch vehicle recovery technology[J]. Journal of Deep Space Exploration, 2022, 9(5): 457–469 [Google Scholar]
  7. DANIEL J, BRUCE P, MARK E N. The reusable launch vehicle challenge[R]. AIAA-2026-7208 [Google Scholar]
  8. SZMUK M, ACIKMESE B, BERNING A W. Successive convexification for fuel-optimal powered landing with aerodynamic drag and non-convex constraints[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation, & Control Conference, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  9. LU P. Introducing computational guidance and control[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017, 40(2): 193. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. BETTS J T. Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1998, 21(2): 193–207. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. SONG Zhengyu, WANG Cong. Development of online trajectory planning technology for launch vehicle return and landing[J]. Astronauticla Systems Engineering Technology, 2019, 3(6): 1–12 [Google Scholar]
  12. WANG J, CUI N, WEI C. Rapid trajectory optimization for hypersonic entry using convex optimization and pseudospectral method[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2019, 91(4): 669–679. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  13. WANG J, CUI N, WEI C. Optimal rocket landing guidance using convex optimization and model predictive control[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2019, 42(5): 1078–1092. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. LIU X, LU P, PAN B. Survey of convex optimization for aerospace applications[J]. Astrodynamics, 2017, 1: 23–40. [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. MALYUTA D, YU Y, ELANGO P, et al. Advances in trajectory optimization for space vehicle control[J]. Annual Reviews in Control, 2021, 52: 282–315. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  16. MALYUTA D, REYNOLDS T P, SZMUK M, et al. Convex optimization for trajectory generation: a tutorial on generating dynamically feasible trajectories reliably and efficiently[J]. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2022, 42(5): 40–113. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  17. BLACKMORE L. Autonomous precision landing of space rockets[J]. The Bridge, 2016, 4(46): 15–20 [Google Scholar]
  18. SONG Z, WANG C, THEIL S, et al. Survey of autonomous guidance methods for powered planetary landing[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2020, 21: 652–674 [Google Scholar]
  19. SCHARF D P, REGEHR M W, VAUGHAN G M, et al. ADAPT demonstrations of onboard large-divert guidance with a VTVL rocket[C]//2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  20. SZMUK M, ACIKMESE B, BERNING A W. Successive convexification for fuel-optimal powered landing with aerodynamic drag and non-convex constraints[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  21. REYNOLDS T P, MESBAHI M. Optimal planar powered descent with independent thrust and torque[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2020, 43(7): 1225–1231. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  22. LIU X. Fuel-optimal rocket landing with aerodynamic controls[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2019, 42(1): 65–77. [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. YANG R, LIU X. Fuel-optimal powered descent guidance with free final-time and path constraints[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2020, 172: 70–81. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  24. SZMUK M, REYNOLDS T P, AÇKMEŞE B. Successive convexification for real-time six-degree-of-freedom powered descent guidance with state-triggered constraints[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2020, 43(8): 1399–1413. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  25. REYNOLDS T P, SZMUK M, MALYUTA D, et al. Dual quaternion-based powered descent guidance with state-triggered constraints[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2020, 43(9): 1584–1599. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  26. LU P. Propellant-optimal powered descent guidance[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017, 41(4): 813–826 [Google Scholar]
  27. LIU X, LU P, PAN B. Survey of convex optimization for aerospace applications[J]. Astrodynamics, 2017, 1(1): 23–40. [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. LI Qingyang. Numerical analysis[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2001 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  29. TANG Guojin, YONG Enmi, LUO Yazhong. Theory, method and application of spacecraft trajectory optimization[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  30. GARG D, PATTERSON M, HAGER W W, et al. A unified framework for the numerical solution of optimal control problems using pseudospectral methods[J]. Automatica, 2010, 46(11): 1843–1851. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  31. ANTSAKLIS P J, MICHEL A N. A linear systems primer[M]. Birkhäuser Boston: Springer Science & Business Media, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  32. WANG Chi, LIU Wei, GAO Yang. Three convexification-based methods for six-degree-of-freedom powered descent guidance[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2025, 51(4): 1292–1303 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  33. DOMAHIDI A, CHU E, BOYD S. ECOS: an SOCP solver for embedded systems[C]//2013 European Control Conference, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  34. MULEKAR O, CHO H, BEVILACQUA R. Six-degree-of-freedom optimal feedback control of pinpoint landing using deep neural networks[C]//AIAA Scitech 2023 Forum, 2023 [Google Scholar]
  35. WANG Z. Trajectory optimization and guidance design by convex programming[D]. West Lafayette: Purdue University, 2018 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.