EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 43 / No 6 (December 2025) JNWPU, 43 6 (2025) 1235-1245 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 43, Number 6, December 2025
Page(s) 1235 - 1245
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20254361235
Published online 02 February 2026
  1. ATANASSOV K. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets System, 1986, 20(1): 87–96. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  2. ALI W, SHAHEEN T, HAQ I U, et al. Multiple-attribute decision making based on intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy connection set environment[J]. Symmetry, 2023, 15(3): 778. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  3. KUMAR R, KUMAR S. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measure with applications in decision-making, pattern recognition, and clustering problems[J]. Granular Computing, 2023, 8(5): 1027–1050. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  4. YU Peng, LI Ranran. (N, U)-implication: a kind of new fuzzy implication constructed by uninorms and fuzzy negation[J]. Journal of Shandong University, 2023, 58(5): 1–9 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. WU X, TANG H, ZHU Z, et al. Nonlinear strict distance and similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets with applications to pattern classification and medical diagnosis[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 13918. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. BUSTINCE H, FERNANDEZ J, MESIAR R, et al. Overlap functions[J]. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 2010, 72(3/4): 1488–1499 [Google Scholar]
  7. DIMURO G P, BEDREGAL B. On residual implications derived from overlap functions[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 312: 78–88. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  8. DIMURO G P, BEDREGAL B, BUSTINCE H, et al. On additive generators of overlap functions[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2016, 287: 76–96. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  9. QIAO J. On discrete quasi-overlap functions[J]. Information Sciences, 2022, 584: 603–617. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  10. ELKANO M, GALAR M, SANZ J A, et al. Enhancing multiclass classification in FARC-HD fuzzy classifier: on the synergy between n-dimensional overlap functions and decomposition strategies[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 23(5): 1562–1580 [Google Scholar]
  11. QIAO J, HU B Q. On interval additive generators of interval overlap functions and interval grouping functions[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2017, 323: 19–55. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  12. WEN X, ZHANG X, LEI T. Intuitionistic fuzzy(IF) overlap functions and IF-rough sets with applications[J]. Symmetry, 2021, 13(8): 1494. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  13. PUŠKA A, BEGANOVIC A I, ŠADIC S. Model for investment decision making by applying the multi-criteria analysis method[J]. Serbian Journal of Management, 2018, 13(1): 7–28. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. YU Peng, DANG Siyu, LI Ranran. U-modus ponens, U-modus tollens and U-hypothetical syllogism property of(G, N)-implication[J]. Journal of Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, 2024, 42(2): 224–232 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. PARASKEVAS A, MADAS M. A hybrid decision-making conceptual framework based on generalized information quality under neutrosophic evidence theory: a comparative analysis[J]. Operational Research, 2025, 25(1): 1–23. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  16. SONG H X, YU P, LIU H. From pre-(quasi-) grouping functions to directional monotonic fuzzy implications[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2023, 466: 108445. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  17. WU Y, XU C, HUANG Y, et al. Green supplier selection of electric vehicle charging based on Choquet integral and type-2 fuzzy uncertainty[J]. Soft Computing, 2020, 24(5): 3781–3795. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  18. ZADEH L A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and control, 1965, 8(3): 338–353. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  19. XU Z S, YAGER R R. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of General Systems, 2006, 35(4): 417–433. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  20. XU Z. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, 15(6): 1179–1187. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  21. HONG D H, CHOI C H. Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114(1): 103–113. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  22. URBANSKI M K, WA J. Fuzzy measurement theory[J]. Measurement, 2008, 41(4): 391–402. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  23. CHOQUET Gustave. Theory of capacities[C]//Annales de l'Institut Fourier, 1954: 131–295 [Google Scholar]
  24. XU Z. Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information[J]. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(5): 726–736. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  25. BAN A, FECHETE I. Componentwise decomposition of some lattice-valued fuzzy integrals[J]. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(6): 1430–1440. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  26. LI Lu. Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integrals and their application in modeling linguistic quantifiers[D]. Xi'an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2011 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. MUROFUSHI T, SUGENO M. Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals[J]. Fuzzy Measures and Integrals: Theory and Applications, 2000, 2000: 3–41 [Google Scholar]
  28. TAN C, CHEN X. Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(1): 149–157. [Article] [Google Scholar]
  29. SHAHRYARI NIA A, OLFAT L, ESMAEILI A, et al. Using fuzzy Choquet Integral operator for supplier selection with environmental considerations[J]. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2016, 17(4): 503–526. [Article] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.