Open Access
Volume 37, Number 3, June 2019
Page(s) 523 - 531
Published online 20 September 2019
  1. ZhuJihong, ZhangShangmin, ZhouChijun, et al. Dynamic Characteristics and Challenges for Control System of Super-Maneuverable Aircraft[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2014, (12): 1650-1662 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  2. WangQing, QianWeiqi, DingDi. A Review of Unsteady Aerodynamic Modeling of Aircrafts at High Angles of Attack[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(8): 2331-2347 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  3. SnellS A, DaleF N, WilliamL A. Nonlinear Inversion Flight Control for a Supermaneuverable Aircraft[J]. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 1990, 15(4): 976-984 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu F, Gopalarathnam A, Kim S. Post-Stall Aerodynamic Modeling and Gain-Scheduled Control Design[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2005: 6169 [Google Scholar]
  5. ZhuJiaqiang, GuoSuofeng. Neural-Net Based Adaptive Reconfigurable Control for a Super-Maneuverable Aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2003, 24(3): 246-250 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  6. LiuShuguang, SunXiuxia, DongWenhan. Design of Post-Stall Maneuvering Flight Control Law Based on Dynamic Surface Control[J]. Systems Engineering & Electronics, 2010, 28(6): 41-44 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  7. WuD, ChenM, GongH. Robust Control of Post-Stall Pitching Maneuver Based on Finite-Time Observer[J]. ISA Transactions, 2017, 70: 53-63 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. FanZiqiang, FangZhenping Robust, Nonlinear Control Design for a Poststall Maneuver Aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2002, 23(3): 193-196 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  9. TolH J, De VisserC C, Van KampenE, et al. Nonlinear Multivariate Spline-Based Control Allocation for High-Performance Aircraft[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37(6): 1840-1862 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Atesoglu, Zgren M K. Nonlinear Robust Controller Design for High-Alpha Maneuvering Enhancement of a Fighter Aircraft with Aerodynamic and Thrust Vectoring Controls[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2008: 6488 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dwivedi P N, Bhale P G, Bhattacharya A, et al. State Estimation Using UKF and Predictive Guidance for Engaging Barrel Roll Aircrafts[C]//American Control Conference, 2013: 6175-6180 [Google Scholar]
  12. LiuChunming, ZhaoZhijun, BuChen, et al. Double Degree-of-Freedom Large Amplitude Motion Test Technology in Low Speed Wind Tunnel[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(8): 2417-2425 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  13. LyuY, ZhangW, ShiJ, et al. Unsteady Aerodynamic Modeling of Biaxial Coupled Oscillation Based on Improved ELM[J]. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2017, 60: 58-67 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.