Open Access
Volume 37, Number 4, August 2019
Page(s) 650 - 655
Published online 23 September 2019
  1. Farhat C, Roux F X. A Method of Finite Element Tearing and Interconnecting and Its Parallel Solution Algorithm[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1991, 32(6): 1205–1227 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Park K C, Justino M R, Felippa C A. An Algebraically Partitioned FETI Method for Parallel Structural Analysis:Algorithm Description[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2015, 40(15): 2717–2737 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Farhat C, Lesoinne M, Letallec P. FETI-DP:a Dual-Primal Unified FETI Method-Part Ⅰ:a Faster Alternative to the Two-Level FETI Method[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001, 50(7): 1523–1544 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Li Bin, Yang Zhichun. A Localized FETI Method for Structural Parallel Analysis[J]. Structure & Environment Engineering, 2007, 34(4): 1–7 [Article] (In chinese) [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haikal G, Hjelmstad K D. An Enriched Discontinuous Galerkin Formulation for The Coupling of Non-Conforming Meshes[J]. Finite Elements in Analysis & Design, 2010, 46(6): 496–503 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jr L A G B, Manzoli O L, Prazeres P G C, et al. A Coupling Technique for Non-Matching Finite Element Meshes[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 2015, 290: 19–44 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thévenaz P, Blu T, Unser M. Interpolation Revisited[J]. IEEE Trans on Medical Imaging, 2000, 19(7): 739–758 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cebral J, Lohner R. Conservative Load Projection and Tracking for Fluid-Structure Problems[J]. AIAA Journal, 1997, 35(4): 687–692 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hosters N, Helmig J, Stavrev A, et al. Fluid-Structure Interaction with NURBS-Based Coupling[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 2018, 332: 520–539 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boer A D, Zuijlen A H V, Bijl H. Review of Coupling Methods for Non-Matching Meshes[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 2007, 196(8): 1515–1525 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Su Bo, Shi Qiyin, Qian Ruojun. Preliminary Study on the Use of Radial Basis Function in Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(1): 59–63 [Article] (In chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Boer A D, Zuijlen A H V, Bijl H. Radial Basis Functions for Interface Interpolation and Mesh Deformation[J]. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2009, 71: 143–178 [Article] [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  13. Costin W J, Allen C B. Numerical Study of Radial Basis Function Interpolation for Data Transfer Across Discontinuous Mesh Interfaces[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2013, 72(10): 1076–1095 [Article] [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang L. Radial Basis Functions Methods for Boundary Value Problems:Performance Comparison[J]. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2017, 84: 191–205 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith M J, Cesnik C E S, Hodges D H. Evaluation of Some Data Transfer Algorithms for Noncontiguous Meshes[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2000, 13(2): 52–58 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Beckert A, Wendland H. Multivariate Interpolation for Fluid-Structure-Interaction Problems Using Radial Basis Functions[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2001, 5(2): 125–134 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Felippa C A, Park K C, Fiho M R J. The Construction of Free-Free Flexibility Matrices as Generalized Stiffness Inverses[J]. Computers and Structures, 1998, 68(4): 411–418 10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00068-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.