EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 38 / No 5 (October 2020) JNWPU, 38 5 (2020) 1084-1093 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 38, Number 5, October 2020
Page(s) 1084 - 1093
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20203851084
Published online 08 December 2020
  1. Zhang Min, Xia Weizheng, Huang Kun, et al. Guidance Law for Cooperative Tracking of a Ground Target Based on Leader-Follower Formation of UAVs[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39 (2): 321497 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Negash L, Kim S H, Choi H L. Distributed Observes for Cyber-Attack Detection and Isolation in Formation-Flying Unmanned Aerial Vehicles[J]. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2017, 14 (2): 1– 15 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang H, Jiang B, Zhang Y M. Fault-Tolerant Shortest Connection Topology Design for Formation Control[J]. International Journal of Control Automation and Systems, 2014, 12 1: 29– 36 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Xu D Z, Jiang B, Shi P. Robust NSV Fault-Tolerant Control System Design against Actuator Faults and Control Surface Damage under Actuator Dynamics[J]. IEEE Trans on Industrial Electronics, 2015, 62 (9): 5919– 5928 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang Q S, Huang D, Duan Z S. et al. Consensus Tracking Control with Transient Performance Improvement for a Group of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Subject to Faults and Parameter Uncertainty[J]. International Journal of Control, 2019, 92 (4): 796– 815 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Giulietti F, Pollini L, Innocenti M. Autonomous Formation Flight[J]. IEEE Control Systems, 2000, 20 (6): 34– 44 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pollini L, Giulietti F, Innocenti M. Robustness to Communication Failures within Formation Flight[C]//Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference, Anchorage, AK, USA, 2002: 2860–2866 [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang B, Zhang Y M. An Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Sliding Mode Control Allocation Scheme for Multi-Rotor Helicopter Subject to Simultaneous Actuator Faults[J]. IEEE Trans on Industrial, Electronics, 2018, 65 (5): 4227– 4236 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li P, Yu X, Peng X Y, et al. Fault-Tolerant Cooperative Control for Multiple UAVS Based on Sliding Mode Techniques[J]. Science China Information Sciences, 2017, 60 (7): 070204 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mohamed A K, Khaled A G, Zhang Y M. Real-Time Fault-Tolerant Cooperative Control of Multiple UAVS-UGVS in the Presence of Actuator Faults[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2017, 88 (2/3/4): 469– 480 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yu X, Liu Z X, Zhang Y M. Fault-Tolerant Formation Control of Multiple UAVS in the Presence of Actuator Faults[J]. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2016, 26 (12): 2668– 2685 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yu Z Q, Qu Y H, Zhang Y M. Fault-Tolerant Control of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Based on Distributed Sliding-Mode Observer[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2019, 93: 163– 177 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang G Q, Luo H, Hu X X, et al. Fault-Tolerant Communication Topology Management Based on Minimum Cost Arborescence for Leader-Follower UAV Formation under Communication Faults[J]. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2017, 14 (2): 2551– 2565 [Article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu D Z, Jiang B, Shi P. Robust NSV Fault-Tolerant Control System Design against Actuator Faults and Control Surface Damage under Actuator Dynamics[J]. IEEE Trans on Industrial Electronics, 2015, 62 (9): 5919– 5928 [Article] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lai Wei, Meng Bin, Sun Hongfei. Robust Attitude Control of Hypersonic Vehicles in Reentry Phase[J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2015, 88 (5): 885– 896 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.