EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 41 / No 6 (Decembre 2023) JNWPU, 41 6 (2023) 1054-1063 References
Open Access
Issue
JNWPU
Volume 41, Number 6, Decembre 2023
Page(s) 1054 - 1063
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20234161054
Published online 26 February 2024
  1. XIAO Liming, QI Haisheng, QU Jikun, et al. Air target threat assessment based on intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Detection & Control, 2019, 41(3): 108–111 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. ZHANG Yanfeng, LIU Jianshu, ZHANG Shifeng. A multi-attribute threat assessment method based on analytical hierarchy process and entropy method[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2019, 39(2): 163–165 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. GUO Jia. Multiple attribute decision making based air-targets threat assessment methods[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. GAO Yang, HUANG Yangchao, CHENG Guobing, et al. Multi-target threat assessment method based on vikor and three-way decisions under intuitionistic fuzzy information[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2021, 49(3): 542–549 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. WU Hua, SU Xiuqin. Threat assessment of aerial targets based on group generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets[J]. Control and Decision, 2015, 30(8): 1462–1468 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. WANG Yu, ZHANG Weiguo, FU Li, et al. Dynamic situation assessment method of aerial warfare based on improved evidence network[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(12): 3896–3909 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. BENAVOLI A, RISTIC B, FARINA A, et al. An approach to threat evaluation based on evidential networks[C]//10th International Conference on Information Fusion, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  8. HU Tao, WANG Dong, SUN Yao, et al. Air combat threat assessment of improved CRITIC-LRA and grey TOPSIS[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(12): 2561–2569 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. ZHANG Haowei, XIE Junwei, GE Jiaang. Intuitionistic fuzzy set threat assessment based on improved TOPSIS and multiple times fusion[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(10): 2263–2269 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. LIU Haibo, WANG Heping, SHEN Liding. Target threat assessment using SAPSO and grey neural network[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2016, 34(1): 26–32 [Article] (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. CHEN Xia, LIU Zilong, LIANG Wenli. Assessment of aerial target threat based on genetic algorithm optimizing fuzzy recurrent wavelet neural network[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2019, 37(2): 424–432 [Article] (in Chinese) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. XI Zhifei, XU An, KOU Yingxin, et al. Target threat assessment in air combat based on PCA-MPSO-ELM algorithm[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(9): 323895 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. GUO Hui, XU Haojun, LIU Ling. Threat assessment of air combat based on support vector machines for regression[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010, 36(1): 123–126 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. LI Wei. Design of autonomous decision-making method and simulation platform for ground combat of RSIUAV[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. LIU Yuefeng, CHEN Shaodong, ZHAO Zhenyu, et al. Threat assessment of manned/unmanned combat aerial vehicle formation air-to-ground attack based on FBNs[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(8): 1635–1639 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. DI Ruohai, GAO Xiaoguang, GUO Zhigao. The modeling method with Bayesian networks and its application in the threat assessment under small data sets[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2016, 44(6): 1504–1511 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. GUO Zhigao. Research on parameter learning of Bayesian networks from small data sets[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2019 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. DAPHNE Koller, NIR Friedman. Probabilistic graphical models[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2009 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.